MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756314343

Exacerbated Cardiac Fibrosis in Apelin-deficient Mice post Myocardial Infarction is Associated with Vimentin and MicroRNA-378

2013· dissertation· en· W2756314343 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jennifer Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicApelin-related biomedical research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsApelinVimentinmicroRNAMedicineMyocardial infarctionFibrosisCardiac fibrosisMyocardial fibrosisCardiologyInternal medicineImmunohistochemistryBiologyGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Apelin-APJ system is transiently up-regulated in murine models of cardiac dysfunction. We have previously shown that Apelin-deficient mice subjected to aortic constriction suffer from severe fibrosis. In turn, we hypothesized that Apelin deficiency will also exaggerate the fibrosis phenotype post experimental myocardial infarction, associated with changes in fibroblast cell activity. Apelin-deficient and wildtype mice were randomly subjected to sham operation or left coronary artery ligation. Apelin deficiency worsened cardiac functionality, enhanced fibrosis-related gene expression and morphology, and enhanced vimentin intermediate filament expression, which may be involved in increasing fibroblast proliferation. MicroRNA target prediction softwares predict that apelin and vimentin 3 ’UTRs are potential targets of microRNA-378 regulation, and were confirmed with Luciferase reporter assays and western blot. Apelin up-regulation may be a useful strategy for attenuating unfavorable fibrosis through down-regulating vimentin-mediated adverse fibroblast activity. MicroRNA-378 regulation may be partly responsible for changes in apelin and vimentin expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicApelin-related biomedical researchFrench-language works237,207