MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756763518

Teachers matter: Examining the feasibility and acceptability of a multimedia transformational teaching intervention

2014· article· en· W2756763518 on OpenAlexaff
Megan Kaulius, Mark R. Beauchamp

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPhysical Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformational leadershipPsychologyFeelingContext (archaeology)Competence (human resources)Mathematics educationIntervention (counseling)PedagogySocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physical Education has been highlighted as an important setting for promoting children’s physical activity engagement beyond the school context (Trudeau & Shephard, 2008). Previous research has, however, found that elementary school teachers report difficulty in effectively implementing physical education, with feelings of low competence in the subject (Faulkner & Reeves, 2000) and competition with other subjects (Morgan & Hansen, 2008) as barriers. Drawing from the tenets of transformational leadership theory (Bass & Riggio, 2006), a 30-minute film (entitled ‘Teachers Matter: Engaging Youth through Transformational Teaching’) and resource materials were developed as part of a multimedia intervention. In order to test the feasibility and acceptability of the program, semi-structured interviews were conducted with elementary school teachers (N = 9), who had watched the film and utilized the  accompanying resource materials. The results revealed that teachers responded positively, with many teachers reporting feeling “inspired” and “motivated” by the multimedia intervention. The teachers were able to identify and describe the theoretical components of transformational teaching after making use of the resources, and many teachers conveyed that they reflected on means to improve their teaching practice following exposure to the program. All 9 teachers reported moderate to high ability to implement the program in their own day-to-day teaching practices, satisfaction with the film, and relevance of the material. Overall, the feedback garnered from the teachers indicated that the program is feasible and a valuable resource. This multimedia intervention represents a simple and cost-effective means of intervention, and has the potential to support elementary teachers’ interactions with students. In turn, such interactions have the possibility to positively impact students’ cognitions toward, and engagement in, physical activity.Acknowledgments: We would like to acknowledge the Social Sciences and Humanities and Research Council (SSHRC) and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research for their support of this project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhysical Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207