MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756805440 · doi:10.1161/hyp.70.suppl_1.044

Abstract 044: Sex Differences in Relative Contributions of Hemodynamic Parameters to Blood Pressure: A Population-based Study of Adolescents and Middle-aged Adults

2017· article· en· W2756805440 on OpenAlexaff
Catriona Syme, Jean Shin, Michał Abrahamowicz, Gabriel Leonard, Michel Perron, Louis Richer, Suzanne Veillette, Daniel Gaudet, Tomáš Paus, Zdenka Pausová

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à ChicoutimiMcGill UniversityHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlood pressureMedicineAmbulatory blood pressureHemodynamicsInternal medicinePopulationDiastoleHeart rateMiddle ageStroke volumeCohortAmbulatoryCardiologyDemographyPhysiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypertension is a leading cause of death. Sex differences in blood pressure (BP) and hypertension prevalence emerge during adolescence and remain throughout reproductive age. Sex differences in BP-underlying hemodynamics, i.e., in the relative contributions of stroke volume (SV), total peripheral resistance (TPR) and heart rate (HR) to BP, have not been investigated in these age categories in a population-based setting. We studied a cohort of 1,347 individuals, including 911 adolescents (12-18 years, 52 % female) and 426 young to middle-aged adults (36-65 years, 56 % female). Beat-by-beat systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP), together with HR, SV, and TPR, were measured with a Finometer throughout a 52-min protocol; the protocol was intended to “mimic” daily-life activities, such as changes in posture and mental stress. It is well established that BP during regular daily activities (ambulatory BP monitoring) is a better predictor of target-organ damage than standard office BP. The relative contributions of HR, SV and TPR to SBP and DBP were determined by decomposing the model-explained variance into non-negative contributions. The relative contributions of SV, TPR and HR to SBP and DBP showed marked sex differences in young and middle-aged adults. The main determinant of higher SBP was SV in females (55 [50-60] % in females vs. only 35 [30-40] % in males), whereas it was TPR in males (47 [41-52] % in males vs. only 30 [26-34] % in females). The main determinant of higher DBP was TPR in both sexes, but its contribution was higher in males than females (58 [52-63] % vs. 41 [36-45] %, respectively). These sex differences were seen across most of the 52-min protocol, being most prominent during standing and least evident during mental stress. Similar sex differences were observed in adolescents, but they were less pronounced, being significant only during standing. The present population-based study of adolescents and young to middle-aged adults, suggest that marked sex differences exist in BP-underlying hemodynamics, with BP being driven mainly by SV in females and by TPR in males. These results underscore the need for sex-specific treatments of hypertension (not recommended currently), which affects 3-5 % of adolescents and 23-58% of young to middle-aged adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207