Isomer activation controls stereospecificity of class I fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (FBP) aldolase, a glycolytic enzyme, catalyzes the reversible and stereospecific aldol addition of dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) and d-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (d-G3P) by an unresolved mechanism. To afford insight into the molecular determinants of FBP aldolase stereospecificity during aldol addition, a key ternary complex formed by DHAP and d-G3P, comprising 2% of the equilibrium population at physiological pH, was cryotrapped in the active site of Toxoplasma gondii aldolase crystals to high resolution. The growth of T. gondii aldolase crystals in acidic conditions enabled trapping of the ternary complex as a dominant population. The obligate 3( S )-4( R ) stereochemistry at the nascent C3–C4 bond of FBP requires a si -face attack by the covalent DHAP nucleophile on the d-G3P aldehyde si -face in the active site. The cis -isomer of the d-G3P aldehyde, representing the dominant population trapped in the ternary complex, would lead to re -face attack on the aldehyde and yield tagatose 1,6-bisphosphate, a competitive inhibitor of the enzyme. We propose that unhindered rotational isomerization by the d-G3P aldehyde moiety in the ternary complex generates the active trans -isomer competent for carbonyl bond activation by active-site residues, thereby enabling si -face attack by the DHAP enamine. C–C bond formation by the cis -isomer is suppressed by hydrogen bonding of the cis -aldehyde carbonyl with the DHAP enamine phosphate dianion through a tetrahedrally coordinated water molecule. The active site geometry further suppresses C–C bond formation with the l-G3P enantiomer of d-G3P. Understanding C–C formation is of fundamental importance in biological reactions and has considerable relevance to biosynthetic reactions in organic chemistry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".