MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2757129688 · doi:10.1111/vox.12548

Enlargement of the <scp>WHO</scp> international repository for platelet transfusion‐relevant bacteria reference strains

2017· article· en· W2757129688 on OpenAlex
Eva Spindler‐Raffel, Richard J. Benjamin, Carl McDonald, Sandra Ramírez‐Arcos, Kate Aplin, Isabelle Bekeredjian‐Ding, Dirk de Korte, Christian Gabriel, Birgit Gathof, K.‐M. Hanschmann, Kai Hourfar, Charlotte Ingram, Michael R. Jacobs, Shawn D. Keil, Yuntong Kou, B. Lambrecht, J. H. Marcelis, Z. Mukhtar, Hideto Nagumo, Truscha Niekerk, J. Rojo, Susanne Marschner, Masahiro Satake, Axel Seltsam, Erhard Seifried, Shaheen Sharafat, Melanie Störmer, Susanne Süßner, Stephen J. Wagner, Roslyn Yomtovían

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVox Sanguinis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood transfusion and management
Canadian institutionsCanadian Blood Services
FundersBundesministerium für Gesundheit
KeywordsMicrobiologyMorganella morganiiStreptococcus dysgalactiaeBacillus cereusSerratia marcescensCereusEnterobacter cloacaeBiologySalmonellaEnterobacterLeukoreductionStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcusStreptococcus agalactiaeBacteriaEscherichia coliEnterobacteriaceaeBlood transfusionImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives Interventions to prevent and detect bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates ( PC s) have reduced, but not eliminated the sepsis risk. Standardized bacterial strains are needed to validate detection and pathogen reduction technologies in PC s. Following the establishment of the First International Reference Repository of Platelet Transfusion‐Relevant Bacterial Reference Strains (the ‘repository’), the World Health Organization ( WHO ) Expert Committee on Biological Standardisation ( ECBS ) endorsed further repository expansion. Materials and Methods Sixteen bacterial strains, including the four repository strains, were distributed from the Paul‐Ehrlich‐Institut ( PEI ) to 14 laboratories in 10 countries for enumeration, identification and growth measurement on days 2, 4 and 7 after low spiking levels [10–25 colony‐forming units ( CFU )/ PC bag]. Spore‐forming ( Bacillus cereus PEI ‐B‐P‐07‐S, Bacillus thuringiensis PEI ‐B‐P‐57‐S), Gram‐negative ( Enterobacter cloacae PEI ‐B‐P‐43, Morganella morganii PEI ‐B‐P‐74, PEI ‐B‐P‐91, Proteus mirabilis PEI ‐B‐P‐55, Pseudomonas fluorescens PEI ‐B‐P‐77, Salmonella choleraesuis PEI ‐B‐P‐78, Serratia marcescens PEI ‐B‐P‐56) and Gram‐positive ( Staphylococcus aureus PEI ‐B‐P‐63, Streptococcus dysgalactiae PEI ‐B‐P‐71, Streptococcus bovis PEI ‐B‐P‐61) strains were evaluated. Results Bacterial viability was conserved after transport to the participating laboratories with one exception ( M. morganii PEI ‐B‐P‐74). All other strains showed moderate‐to‐excellent growth. Bacillus cereus , B. thuringiensis , E. coli , K. pneumoniae , P. fluorescens , S. marcescens , S. aureu s and S. dysgalactiae grew to &gt;10 6 CFU /ml by day 2. Enterobacter cloacae , P. mirabilis , S. epidermidis , S. bovis and S. pyogenes achieved &gt;10 6 CFU /ml at day 4. Growth of S. choleraesuis was lower and highly variable. Conclusion The WHO ECBS approved all bacterial strains (except M. morganii PEI ‐B‐P‐74 and S. choleraesuis PEI ‐B‐P‐78 ) for repository enlargement. The strains were stable, suitable for spiking with low CFU numbers, and proliferation was independent of the PC donor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it