MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2757433780

In from the cold: : How miners and shippers are looking to exploit new Arctic transport routes

2014· article· en· W2757433780 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bruce McMichael

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticExploitSoftware deploymentThe arcticCircumpolar starGeographyOceanographyEngineeringAeronauticsBusinessEnvironmental scienceGeologyComputer scienceComputer security
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Companies including Denmark-based Greenland Rare Earth Projects and NunaMinerals AS, along with Australian developer Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd and locally registered Tanbreez Mining AS ( see box ), are hoping to exploit the country's rare earths deposits. Meanwhile UK-headquartered Rare Earth Minerals Plc and Angel Mining Plc are eyeing up its rare earths and zinc resources, respectively, and Canada's Hudson Resources Inc. have an anorthosite project under development. Based in Montreal, it is the country's largest ocean going dry bulk shipping company and its Nunavik bulk carrier was the first vessel to transit Canada's Northwest Passage with an Arctic cargo of nickel concentrate. Its journey started this September and was successfully completed in mid-October, becoming the first vessel to navigate the route unescorted with an Arctic cargo. The use of UAVs is proving to be extremely beneficial to identify many ice features that should be avoided ahead of the vessel, as well as identifying open water leads to improve voyage efficiency, says Thomas Paterson, senior vice-president, ship owning, Arctic and projects, at Fednav. In addition, the deployment of drones fitted with cameras gives the ice navigator another useful aid when making important decisions while transiting heavy ice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial MineralsSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207