A Randomized Trial of High-dose Influenza Vaccine in Adult Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The annual influenza vaccine is recommended for solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTR) although studies have shown suboptimal immunogenicity. Influenza vaccine containing higher dose antigen may lead to greater immunogenicity in this population. Method We conducted a randomized, observer-blind trial comparing the safety and immunogenicity of high dose (HD; FluzoneHD, Sanofi) vs. standard dose (SD; Fluviral, GSK) influenza vaccine in adult SOTR. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive the 2016–2017 influenza vaccine. Preimmunization and 4-week postimmunization sera underwent strain-specific hemagglutination inhibition assay for the three vaccine strains and an additional B strain not included in the vaccine. Result We randomized 172 patients and 161 (84 HD; 77 SD) were eligible for analysis. Median age was 57 years (range 18–86) and time from transplant was 38 (range 3–1402) months. Types of transplant were kidney 67 (39.0%), liver 38 (22.1%), lung 25 (14.5%), heart 23 (13.3%), and combined 19 (11.0%). Seroconversion to at least one of the three vaccine antigens (primary outcome) was present in 78.6% vs. 55.8% in HD vs. SD vaccine, respectively (P < 0.001). Seroconversion to A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B strains were 40.5% vs. 20.5%, 57.1% vs. 32.5%, and 58.3% vs. 41.6% in HD vs. SD vaccine (P = 0.006, 0.002, 0.028, respectively). Postimmunization geometric mean titers of A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B strains were significantly higher in the HD group (P = 0.007, 0.002, 0.033). Independent factors associated with seroconversion to at least one vaccine strain were the use of HD vaccine and being on mycophenolate doses less than 2 g daily (P = 0.003, 0.013, respectively). Seroconversion rate to the B strain not included in the trivalent study vaccine was also higher in the HD vaccine group (33.3% vs. 14.1%, P = 0.004). Local and systemic adverse events were similar for the two vaccines. Biopsy-proven rejection was seen in 3.4% vs. 1.2% in HD vs. SD groups, respectively (P = 0.62). Two patients in the SD vaccine group and one in the HD group developed influenza infection during the follow-up. Conclusion High-dose vaccine demonstrated significantly better immunogenicity than SD vaccine in adult transplant recipients and may be the preferred influenza vaccine for this population. Disclosures D. Kumar, Sanofi: Speaker’s Bureau, Speaker honorarium. Pfizer: Speaker’s Bureau, Speaker honorarium. GSK: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".