MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2757501516 · doi:10.1063/1.5004398

Inner and outer layer turbulence over a superhydrophobic surface with low roughness level at low Reynolds number

2017· article· en· W2757501516 on OpenAlexaff
Wagih Abu Rowin, Jianfeng Hou, Sina Ghaemi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsReynolds numberTurbulenceParticle image velocimetryBoundary layerMechanicsLaminar sublayerDragLaw of the wallSlip (aerodynamics)Reynolds stressTurbulence kinetic energyOpen-channel flowShear velocityParasitic dragSurface roughnessThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The inner and outer layers of a turbulent channel flow over a superhydrophobic surface (SHS) are characterized using simultaneous long-range microscopic particle tracking velocimetry (micro-PTV) and particle image velocimetry, respectively. The channel flow is operated at a low Reynolds number of ReH = 4400 (based on full channel height and 0.174 m/s bulk velocity), equivalent to Reτ = 140 (based on half channel height and friction velocity). The SHS is produced by spray coating, and the root-mean-square of wall roughness normalized by wall-unit is k+rms = 0.11. The micro-PTV shows 0.023 m/s slip velocity over the SHS (about 13% of the bulk velocity), which corresponds to a slip-length of ∼200 μm. A drag reduction of ∼19% based on the slope of the linear viscous sublayer and 22% based on an analytical expression of Rastegari and Akhavan [J. Fluid Mech. 773, R4 (2015)] realized. The reduced Reτ over the SHS based on the corresponding friction velocity is ∼125, which is in the lower limit of a turbulence regime. The results show the increase of streamwise Reynolds stresses 〈u2〉 for the SHS in the linear viscous sublayer due to the slip boundary condition. The 〈u2〉 peak does not change in magnitude while it is displaced closer to the wall in physical distance. The wall-normal Reynolds stress 〈v2〉 over the SHS and smooth surface is observed to overlap near the wall at y+ < 10, while 〈v2〉 for the SHS is smaller further away from the wall in physical dimensions. At y+ = 30, 〈v2〉 is 30% smaller for the SHS. A small increase of Reynolds shear stress for the SHS is observed at y+ < 10, while about 30% reduction is observed at y+ = 30. The observed variation of Reynolds stresses is associated with the relatively small roughness of the surface. If Reynolds stresses are normalized based on the corresponding friction velocity, the non-dimensional stresses show a large increase of 〈u2〉 and a small increase of 〈uv〉 over the SHS at y+ < 20. Farther away from the wall at y+ > 20, the scaling of Reynolds stresses based on the corresponding uτ results in their overlap for the smooth and SHSs. The drag reduction is mainly associated with the reduction of viscous wall-shear stress, while the variation in Reynolds shear stress at the wall is negligible. The quadrant analysis of turbulent fluctuations shows attenuation of stronger sweep motions at y+ < 15, while ejections are attenuated in the buffer layer at y+ = 20 until 30.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207