العلاقة بين وجهة الضبط والسلوك الصحي (دراسة ميدانية على عينة من الراشدين في مدينة اللاذقية)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
تهدف الدراسة الحالية إلى تعرف العلاقة بين وجهة الضبط والسلوك الصحي لدى عينة من الراشدين في مدينة اللاذقية. كما تهدف إلى تحديد كل من وجهة الضبط والسلوك الصحي لديهم والكشف عن الفروق بينهم في هذه المتغيرات تبعا للنوع. تكونت عينة الدراسة من (100) راشد (44 ذكر و56 أنثى), تم اختيارهم بطريقة عشوائية من مختلف الراشدين في مدينة اللاذقية. استخدمت الباحثة مقياس وجهة الضبط (من إعداد الجمعية الكندية) ومقياس السلوك الصحي (من إعدادالباحثة). أكدت نتائج الدراسة عدم وجود علاقة دالة إحصائيا بين وجهة الضبط والسلوك الصحي لدى العينة المدروسة, كما بينت توجه أفراد عينة البحث نحو السلوك الصحي الإيجابي ونحو الضبط الداخلي. كما توصلت الدراسة إلى وجود فروق دالة إحصائيا في السلوك الصحي بين أفراد العينة حسب متغير النوع و(كانت الفروق لصالح الإناث), وعدم وجود فروق دالة حصائيا في وجهة الضبط تبعا للنوع . The present study aimes to identify the relationship between locus of control and healthy behavior among a sample of adults in Latakia city. It also aimes to determine each of the locus of control and healthy behavior and to discover the differences between them on these variables according to gender . The study sample consisted of (100) adults (44 males and 56 females),whome were randomly selected among different adults in Latakia city. I (the researsher ) used a the scale of the locus of control (prepared by the Canadian society) and the scale of the healthy behavior (prepared by the researcher ). Results of the study confirmed that there were no statistically significant differences between locus of control and the healthy behavior on the studied sample . The results showed that respondents tend to the positive healthy behavior and there was an orientation towards internal controls.The study found that there were significant differences in healthy behavior according to the variable of sex ( the differences were in favor of females) , and there were no significant differences in the locus of control according to sex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.166 | 0.167 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".