Sexual assault on the rock: LGBTQ+ experiences in Newfoundland and Labrador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many studies in North America have concluded that LGBTQ+ people are at a higher risk for \nexperiencing sexual assault than their cisgender/heterosexual counterparts; however, no studies \nto date have explored the experiences of sexual violence among LGBTQ+ people within \nNewfoundland and Labrador. To this end, the objective of this study is to understand the sexual \nexperiences of gender and sexual minority groups that have been uncomfortable, awkward, or \nunwanted within the larger Newfoundland and Labrador LGBTQ+ community. The study was \nadministered through an anonymous, online survey instrument, replicated from Menning and \nHoltzman's (2014) study of on-campus LGBTQ+ sexual violence, and adapted for geographical \ndifferences. The data were analyzed using a traditional content analysis of open-ended responses, \nwhile descriptive statistics are used to summarize the closed-ended responses. Results from the \nstudy indicate that sexual violence is a prominent issue within the community, demonstrating \nthat LGBTQ+ people experience sexual violence similarly to the general population with some \ndifferences. This study is therefore an initial exploration to which further research must be \nconducted in order to advance understanding of this phenomenon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".