The Experience of Non-Francophone Parents in a French Minority-Language School
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Parent involvement is an important indicator for student achievement and is especially important in minority language education. Across Canada a steadily increasing number of students in French minority-language schools come from Anglo-dominant families or other non-Francophone families, where little or no French is spoken. This highlights the importance of understanding the involvement of non-Francophone parents whose children attend French minority-language schools. This paper conveys the experiences, beliefs, and involvement of non-Francophone parents who have chosen a French minority-language school for their children in Atlantic Canada. French school administrators and teachers were also consulted. We relied on a mixed methods approach to improve understanding of this situation. The parents reported satisfaction with their choice of a French minority-language school but also shared challenges they faced to being educationally involved with their children at home, at school, and in the community. Resume L’engagement des parents est un indicateur important pour la reussite des eleves et il l’est encore plus en situation de langue minoritaire. Pourtant, au Canada, un nombre croissant d’enfants dans les ecoles francaises vient de familles anglodominantes et il y a un grand nombre de parents qui parle peu ou pas le francais. Il est vital de comprendre l’engagement des parents non francophones dans la situation des ecoles de langue francaise minoritaire. Nous avons examine les experiences, les croyances et l’engagement des parents non francophones qui ont choisi une ecole francaise au Canada atlantique pour leurs enfants. Des enseignants et des directions d’ecoles ont aussi ete consultes. Nous avons utilise les methodes mixtes afin de comprendre les complexites de l’experience sociale multidimensionnelle. Les parents etaient satisfaits de leur choix d’ecole, malgre les difficultes qu’ils eprouvaient a s’impliquer a la maison, a l’ecole et dans la communaute.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".