MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2758131521 · doi:10.3138/jammi.2.1.013

Case report of cerebral phaeohyphomycosis caused by <i>Fonsecaea monophora</i>

2017· article· en· W2758131521 on OpenAlexaffvenue
William Stokes, Jeff Fuller, Vanessa Meier‐Stephenson, Leah Remington, Bonnie Meatherall

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsProvincial Laboratory of Public HealthAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhaeohyphomycosisVoriconazoleBrain abscessBrain biopsyAmphotericin BAbscessPathologyMedicineBiologyBiopsyAntifungalDermatologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cerebral phaeohyphomycosis (CP) is a rare cause of fungal central nervous system (CNS) infection. Among the many fungal genera associated with CP, Fonsecaea is rarely the culprit pathogen. As such, Fonsecaea-associated CP is poorly understood, with few cases reported in the literature. The authors report a case of a progressive brain abscess caused by F. monophora in a 63-year-old man with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, liver cirrhosis, and recent travel to South Sudan. The patient presented with headache and constitutional symptoms 2 days after returning from South Sudan. Fungal culture of a biopsy from a single left frontal abscess isolated a dematiaceous mould that was identified as F. monophora based on colony morphology and DNA sequence analysis of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. Despite treatment with liposomal amphotericin B and voriconazole, the patient clinically deteriorated and died. Dematiaceous fungal brain abscesses are a rare cause of CNS infections. Early diagnosis with tissue biopsy is essential for timely access to appropriate antifungal therapy. Complete surgical resection is associated with improved outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease CanadaSame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207