MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2758315089

Straddling Two Worlds: Exploring challenges to Syrian refugee children

2017· article· en· W2758315089 on OpenAlexaffabout
Srabani Maitra, Yan Guo, Shibao Guo

Bibliographic record

Venue2017 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugees
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeSyrian refugeesSettlement (finance)Political scienceDisplaced personEconomic growthGender studiesSociologyLawBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 2011, the armed conflict that began in the Syrian Arab Republic has displaced an estimated 12 million Syrians, forcing them to seek refuge in various countries around the world. Over half of those uprooted are children, who traumatized by war had to leave their home and live in camps and resettlement countries. Education is key to integration of refugee children and is considered critical in bringing back a sense of normalcy, routine as well as emotional and social well being in the lives of refugee children as well as their families. In Canada, integration of Syrian refugee children in the public school system has, therefore, been identified as one of the the vital aspects of their settlement needs. This paper, based on our current SSHRC funded research, examines the challenges experienced by newly arrived Syrian refugee children as they struggle to integrate to the Alberta shool system. The study will provide educators, service providers, and policy makers with a better understanding of the larger contexts of Syrian refugee students' schooling (their backgrounds, pre and post migration experiences, barriers to educational success) as well as new directions for facilitating their successful school integration through coordinated programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0370.017
Scholarly communication0.0140.008
Open science0.0030.020
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2017 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of EducationSame topicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugeesFrench-language works237,207