Les rapports entre littérature et philosophie, et la liberté humaine chez Descartes et chez Spinoza
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La litterature ne pourra pas se passer de la philosophe puisque il n’est pas possible de faire une recherche serieuse concernant certains concepts et notions essentiels en litterature sans tenir compte de leur evolution en philosophie. Comme une base pour les recherches sur la notion de la liberte humaine dans l’œuvre des ecrivains et des poetes nous presentons une etude critique et analytique de la meme notion chez les philosophes, particulierement chez Descartes et chez Spinoza. Chez Descartes la volonte est absolue et indivisible puisque choisir, c’est toujours choisir l’un ou l’autre de deux contraires, d’apres lui, ceci est la nature meme de la volonte libre. De l’absolue et evidente liberte de la volonte chez Descartes nous arrivons au concept de liberte- determinisme chez Spinoza; un concept qui est plutot une attitude de sage vis-a-vis du determinisme. Une analyse detaillee de la notion de la liberte humaine et son evolution dans la pensee et l’œuvre de Spinoza par rapport au meme concept chez Descartes est entreprise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".