MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Isolation and ex vivo expansion of murine bone marrow-derived group 2 innate lymphoid cells (MUC8P.734)

2015· article· en· W2758530685 on OpenAlexaff
Claudia U. Duerr, Connor D A McCarthy, Barbara C. Mindt, Jörg H. Fritz

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicIL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInnate lymphoid cellBiologyImmunologyBone marrowInnate immune systemImmune systemCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) are recently discovered lymphocyte subpopulations that have innate ability to produce large quantities of a specific set of cytokines regulating innate and adaptive immune responses. Importantly, deregulated ILC2 responses are implicated in detrimental type 2 immunopathologies such as allergies, asthma and atopic dermatitis, as well as fibrotic disease, both in rodents and humans. However, the progress in our understanding of ILC2 biology has been hampered by their scarcity at steady state as well as infected and inflamed tissues. Here, a simple, efficient and reliable method is presented to isolate murine ILC2 from the bone marrow by flow cytometric cell sorting and further cultivate them using a defined cytokine cocktail, yielding a 500-fold expansion. The resulting ILC2 constitute a pure cell population and show the same phenotypic and functional characteristics as ILC2 in vivo. Thus, this protocol enables a high yield of ILC2 from murine bone marrow and thereby provides sufficient ILC2 numbers for standard cell and molecular biology assays. An in-depth understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of ILC2 is essential for the development of new strategies and drugs to fight unwanted type 2 immunopathologies and fibrotic disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicIL-33, ST2, and ILC PathwaysFrench-language works237,207