MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2758692702 · doi:10.1080/17539153.2017.1384154

Hamm &amp; Spaaij’s <i>The Age of Lone Wolf Terrorism</i> and the prospect of a heterodox terrorism studies <b>The age of lone wolf terrorism</b> , by Mark S. Hamm and Ramon Spaaij, New York, Columbia University Press, 2017, 322 pp., £27.95 (hardcover) ISBN 9780231181747, £27.9 (e-book) ISBN 9780231543774.

2017· article· en· W2758692702 on OpenAlexaff
Kris Millett

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Studies on Terrorism · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerrorismPolitical scienceCounter terrorismSociologyLawMedia studiesLaw and economicsPolitical economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Those familiar with this journal will be aware of long-standing critiques levied at so-called “orthodox terrorism studies” for among other things, its ahistoricism, its alignment with Western secur...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Studies on TerrorismSame topicTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceFrench-language works237,207