Quantification and analysis of remanufacturing waste streams for improving product design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis explores sources of obstacles to remanufacturing, particularly those irnposed by product design.Remanufacturing, or product recycling, addresses the negative environmental impacts tiom product disposal.Businesses may choose to remanufacture because of influences From ethics and legislation.Effective design to facilitate remanufacninng requires technical knowledge of the desibg influence on remanufactunng feasibility.Examination of remanufacturers' wasre strearns yields empincai evidence of four types of obstacles: product-feature damage, process-sxecution problems.issues outside of the remanufacnving process, and unidentified problems.Additionally.root causes of the obstacles are surmised.A preliminary reference for design for rernanufacture, in the form of tables with root causes and obstacles cross-indexed, is presented.A designer can examine their own product for root causes and possible remanufacturing obstacles.For each table entry, the specific product studied and ~t s proportion of waste Stream that was affected by the discard reason are available for further rekrence....
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".