Mixed Aliphatic Self-Assembled Monolayers with Embedded Polar Group
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied structure, molecular orientation, morphology, and electrostatic properties of mixed self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) comprised of alkanethiolates (ATs) which are modified by a dipolar ester group embedded into the alkyl backbone at two different orientations, namely, with the dipole directed upward and downward from the substrate. The packing density and molecular orientation in these SAMs were found to be similar to those of the “parent” single-component monolayers. Applying X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) as a morphology tool, we could estimate that the mixed SAMs represent homogeneous intermolecular mixtures of both components, down to the molecular level, excluding existence of “hot spots” for charge injection. The analysis of the C 1s XPS spectra and the work function data suggests that the composition of the mixed SAMs fully mimicked the mixing ratio of both components in the solutions from which these SAMs were prepared, which suggests a minor role of the dipole–dipole interaction in the overall balance of the structure-building forces. Varying this composition, work function of the gold substrate could be tuned linearly, in controlled fashion within a ∼1.1 eV range, between the ultimate values for the single-component monolayers with a fixed orientation of the embedded ester group, namely, 3.83 and 4.92 eV. This adjustment could be performed keeping the chemical composition at the SAM-ambient interface unchanged, which, along with tunability and homogeneity of these films, is a great advantage of the midchain substituted monolayers, qualifying them for energy-level alignment in model systems and organic electronics devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".