MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prognostic implication of GATA3 gene mutation on survival in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

2017· article· en· W2758972505 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karthik Kailasam, Mohammad Omaira, Hardik Satish Chhatrala, Marie Ravichandar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGATA3Breast cancerEstrogen receptorOncologyInternal medicineDuctal carcinomaCarcinomaCancerMale breast cancerPathologyGeneBiologyTranscription factorGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e13114 Background: GATA3 encodes a transcription factor, which is involved in activation and suppression of genes involved in cell maturation. GATA3 is necessary in the adult mammary gland to maintain the integrity and function of the luminal epithelium. Methods: METABRIC project funded by cancer research UK, the British Columbia cancer foundation and the Canadian breast cancer foundation mapped 173 gene mutations and amplifications in 2,433 primary breast tumors. Retrospective analysis was done for patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast in the age group 30-60; to study the effect of GATA3 mutation on survival. Median survival was obtained from Kaplan-Meier plot, and mortality between groups was compared by Odds ratio (OR). Results: A total of 1500 patients across all age groups had invasive ductal carcinoma. 650 were within the age group 30-60; of which 234 died due to the disease, 360 were alive and 55 died due to other causes. 398 patients (61.2%) tested positive for estrogen receptor (ER) and 521 patients (80.2%) were negative for HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2). TP53 (50%) and PIK3CA (36%) mutations were more prevalent. GATA3 mutation was found in 79 patients (12.34%); among which, all 79 patients tested positive for ER (100%) and 74 patients (94.9%) negative for HER2. 10 patients (12.7%) died due to the disease, 62 patients (78.5%) were alive and 7 patients (8.9%) died due to other causes. Hence, patients with GATA3 mutations were more likely to survive (OR 4.66; CI 2.33-9.29 p < 0.0001) than patients without the mutation. The median survival for patients with GATA3 mutation (300 months) was also greater than patients without the mutation (219 months). In addition, patients with GATA3 mutation were more likely to be ER positive and HER2 negative. Conclusions: In the mammary gland, GATA3 is required for luminal epithelial cell differentiation. Loss of GATA3 results in de-differentiation to stem cell phenotype. It is found that GATA3 mutation correlates with a better prognosis compared to more common TP53 and PIK3CA gene mutations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207