Physicochemical and Biological Controls on Carbon and Nitrogen in Permafrost from an Ultraxerous Environment, McMurdo Dry Valleys of Antarctica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Little is known about the abundance and source of soil organic carbon and biogeochemical cycling in permafrost soils from the ultraxerous environment of the Dry Valleys of Antarctica. Here we investigate the distribution, source and cycling of organic carbon, total nitrogen and carbonates in the icy permafrost soils of University Valley, Quartermain Mountains. Results indicate that organic carbon content is lowest in icy soils from the perennially cryotic zone (<40 μg g −1 dry soils) and higher in the icy soils from the seasonally noncryotic zone, where the highest concentrations were found in the warmer‐wetter section of the valley and near a frozen pond (up to 313 μg g −1 dry soils). The δ 13 C org of organic carbon in the icy soils showed that it is derived from the weathering of Beacon Supergroup sandstone that hosts active endolithic communities. The C:N ratios in icy soils formed two populations: one with ratios <5 and the other with ratios near the Redfield ratios. The low C:N ratios suggest that physicochemical processes dominates these soils, as supported by the absence of microbial activity and atmospherically deposited NO 3 with minimal postdeposition modification. The near Redfield C:N ratios can be explained by physical processes (translocation of SOC in the soils from snow meltwater) or balanced microbial activity. The latter is supported by the δ 13 C CaCO3 values of carbonates that suggest a contribution from microbially respired endolith‐derived organic matter, providing indirect evidence of heterotrophic activity in permafrost soils from an ultraxerous environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".