MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2759397991 · doi:10.3324/haematol.2017.170928

CD56 <sup>bright</sup> natural killer regulatory cells in filgrastim primed donor blood or marrow products regulate chronic graft- <i>versus</i> -host disease: the Canadian Blood and Marrow Transplant Group randomized 0601 study results

2017· article· en· W2759397991 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amina Kariminia, Sabine Ivison, Bernard Ng, Jacob Rozmus, Susanna Sung, Avani Varshney, Mahmoud Aljurf, Sylvie Lachance, Irwin Walker, Jeff H. Lipton, Stephanie J. Lee, Jeff Szer, Richard Doocey, Ian A. Lewis, Clayton A. Smith, Naeem Chaudhri, Megan K. Levings, Raewyn Broady, Gerald M. Devins, David Szwajcer, Ronan Foley, Sara Mostafavi, Steven Z. Pavletic, Donna A. Wall, S. Couban, Tony Panzarella, Kirk R. Schultz

Bibliographic record

VenueHaematologica · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityVancouver General HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreBC Cancer AgencyMcMaster UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversity of TorontoDalhousie UniversityHamilton Health SciencesBC Children's HospitalCancerCare ManitobaHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsFilgrastimImmunologyBone marrowMedicineApheresisGraft-versus-host diseaseMyeloidImmune systemNatural killer cellGranulocyte colony-stimulating factorTransplantationCytotoxic T cellInternal medicineBiologyChemotherapyPlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Randomized trials have conclusively shown higher rates of chronic graft-versus-host disease with filgrastim-stimulated apheresis peripheral blood as a donor source than unstimulated bone marrow. The Canadian Blood and Marrow Transplant Group conducted a phase 3 study of adults who received either filgrastim-stimulated apheresis peripheral blood or filgrastim-stimulated bone marrow from human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling donors. Because all donors received the identical filgrastim dosing schedule, this study allowed for a controlled evaluation of the impact of stem cell source on development of chronic graft-versus-host disease. One hundred and twenty-one evaluable filgrastim-stimulated apheresis peripheral blood and filgrastim-stimulated bone marrow patient donor products were immunologically characterized by flow cytometry and tested for their association with acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease within 2 years of transplantation. The immune populations evaluated included, regulatory T cells, central memory and effector T cells, interferon γ positive producing T cells, invariate natural killer T cells, regulatory natural killer cells, dendritic cell populations, macrophages, and activated B cells and memory B cells. When both filgrastim-stimulated apheresis peripheral blood and filgrastim-stimulated bone marrow were grouped together, a higher chronic graft-versus-host disease frequency was associated with lower proportions of CD56bright natural killer regulatory cells and interferon γ-producing T helper cells in the donor product. Lower CD56bright natural killer regulatory cells displayed differential impacts on the development of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease between filgrastim-stimulated apheresis peripheral blood and filgrastim-stimulated bone marrow. In summary, while controlling for the potential impact of filgrastim on marrow, our studies demonstrated that CD56bright natural killer regulatory cells had a much stronger impact on filgrastim-stimulated apheresis peripheral blood than on filgrastim-stimulated bone marrow. This supports the conclusion that a lower proportion of CD56bright natural killer regulatory cells results in the high rate of chronic graft-versus-host disease seen in filgrastim-stimulated apheresis peripheral blood. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: 00438958.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHaematologicaSame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207