MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2759757070 · doi:10.1099/jgv.0.000930

Visualization of the lymphocytic choriomeningitis mammarenavirus (LCMV) genome reveals the early endosome as a possible site for genome replication and viral particle  pre-assembly

2017· article· en· W2759757070 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin R. King, Samuel Kellner, Philip Eisenhauer, Emily A. Bruce, Christopher M. Ziegler, Daniel Zenklusen, Jason Botten

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of General Virology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParvovirus B19 Infection Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsBiologyLymphocytic choriomeningitisVirologyColocalizationRNAViral replicationEndosomeArenavirusGenomeNucleoproteinVirusViral proteinCell biologyMolecular biologyGeneGeneticsCellAntigen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

hybridization (FISH) assay that allows the visualization of lymphocytic choriomeningitis mammarenavirus (LCMV) genomic RNAs in individual cells. We show that viral S segment genomic and antigenomic RNA, along with viral nucleoprotein, colocalize in subcellular structures we presume to be viral replication factories. These viral RNA structures are highly dynamic during acute infection, with the many small foci seen early coalescing into larger perinuclear foci later in infection. These late-forming perinuclear viral RNA aggregates are located near the cellular microtubule organizing centre and colocalize with the early endosomal marker Rab5c and the viral glycoprotein in a proportion of infected cells. We propose that the virus is using the surface of a cellular membrane-bound organelle as a site for the pre-assembly of viral components, including genomic RNA and viral glycoprotein, prior to their transport to the plasma membrane, where new particles will bud.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of General VirologySame topicParvovirus B19 Infection StudiesFrench-language works237,207