MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ASTRIS: A real world treatment study of osimertinib in patients (pts) with EGFR T790M positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2017· article· en· W2759808499 on OpenAlexaff
Filippo de Marinis, Byoung Chul Cho, Dong‐Wan Kim, Sang‐We Kim, Maximilian J. Hochmair, Giulio Metro, Johan Vansteenkiste, David Vicente, Benjamin Solomon, Parneet Cheema, H. Freitas, Mariano Provencio, Yuh‐Min Chen, Yi‐Long Wu, Alvin Milner, James R. Rigas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsimertinibT790MInternal medicineDiscontinuationLung cancerOncologyInterstitial lung diseaseInterim analysisChemotherapyCancerSurgeryGastroenterologyClinical trialLungErlotinibAdenocarcinomaEpidermal growth factor receptorROS1

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

9036 Background: Osimertinib is an oral, irreversible, central nervous system (CNS) active EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) selective for both EGFR-TKI sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations. We report results from the first predefined interim analysis of the ongoing ASTRIS study (NCT02474355). Methods: Pts received osimertinib 80 mg once daily. Eligible pts had Stage IIIB-IV NSCLC harbouring a T790M mutation determined by local validated molecular test (not restricted by sample type), received prior EGFR-TKI therapy, WHO performance status (PS) 0−2, acceptable organ and bone marrow function and no history of interstitial lung disease (ILD) or QTc prolongation. Asymptomatic, stable CNS metastases were permitted. The primary efficacy outcome was overall survival; other outcomes included investigator-assessed response rate (RR), progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation. Safety data are also reported. Results: From study start (18 Sept 2015) to data cut-off (DCO; 3 Nov 2016), 1217 pts received osimertinib from 120 sites with a median follow-up of 4.1 mths ( < 1−14 mths), median age 64 yrs (27–92 yrs), 67% female, 61% White, 37% Asian, 87% WHO PS 0/1, 44% prior chemotherapy, 45% prior radiotherapy. All pts tested positive for T790M, identified from tissue in 682 pts (56%), plasma ctDNA in 433 pts (36%) and from other specimens in 102 pts (8%). At DCO, 317 pts (26%) had discontinued treatment, 900 pts (74%) were ongoing, median duration of exposure 3.8 mths ( < 1–13.2 mths), 168 pts (14%) had disease progression and 156 pts (13%) had died. In pts evaluable for response, the investigator-assessed RR was 64% (569/886; 95% CI 61, 67). Adverse events (AEs) leading to dose modification and treatment discontinuation were reported in 122 (10%) and 54 pts (4%), respectively. Serious AEs were reported in 165 pts (14%) and AEs leading to death in 30 pts (2%). ILD/pneumonitis-like events were reported in 25 pts (2%), and QTc prolongation in 9 pts (1%). Conclusions: ASTRIS, the largest reported clinical study of osimertinib in T790M-positive NSCLC, demonstrates clinical activity similar to that observed in the osimertinib clinical trial program with no new safety signals. Clinical trial information: NCT02474355.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.486
Teacher spread0.425 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207