ASTRIS: A real world treatment study of osimertinib in patients (pts) with EGFR T790M positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
9036 Background: Osimertinib is an oral, irreversible, central nervous system (CNS) active EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) selective for both EGFR-TKI sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations. We report results from the first predefined interim analysis of the ongoing ASTRIS study (NCT02474355). Methods: Pts received osimertinib 80 mg once daily. Eligible pts had Stage IIIB-IV NSCLC harbouring a T790M mutation determined by local validated molecular test (not restricted by sample type), received prior EGFR-TKI therapy, WHO performance status (PS) 0−2, acceptable organ and bone marrow function and no history of interstitial lung disease (ILD) or QTc prolongation. Asymptomatic, stable CNS metastases were permitted. The primary efficacy outcome was overall survival; other outcomes included investigator-assessed response rate (RR), progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation. Safety data are also reported. Results: From study start (18 Sept 2015) to data cut-off (DCO; 3 Nov 2016), 1217 pts received osimertinib from 120 sites with a median follow-up of 4.1 mths ( < 1−14 mths), median age 64 yrs (27–92 yrs), 67% female, 61% White, 37% Asian, 87% WHO PS 0/1, 44% prior chemotherapy, 45% prior radiotherapy. All pts tested positive for T790M, identified from tissue in 682 pts (56%), plasma ctDNA in 433 pts (36%) and from other specimens in 102 pts (8%). At DCO, 317 pts (26%) had discontinued treatment, 900 pts (74%) were ongoing, median duration of exposure 3.8 mths ( < 1–13.2 mths), 168 pts (14%) had disease progression and 156 pts (13%) had died. In pts evaluable for response, the investigator-assessed RR was 64% (569/886; 95% CI 61, 67). Adverse events (AEs) leading to dose modification and treatment discontinuation were reported in 122 (10%) and 54 pts (4%), respectively. Serious AEs were reported in 165 pts (14%) and AEs leading to death in 30 pts (2%). ILD/pneumonitis-like events were reported in 25 pts (2%), and QTc prolongation in 9 pts (1%). Conclusions: ASTRIS, the largest reported clinical study of osimertinib in T790M-positive NSCLC, demonstrates clinical activity similar to that observed in the osimertinib clinical trial program with no new safety signals. Clinical trial information: NCT02474355.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".