MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2759820733 · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000003974

The Pierre Robin Mandible is Hypoplastic and Morphologically Abnormal

2017· article· en· W2759820733 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Zellner, Russell R. Reid, Derek M. Steinbacher

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Craniofacial Surgery · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMandible (arthropod mouthpart)CraniofacialDistraction osteogenesisDentistryOrthodonticsDistractionBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: For Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) patients, there is incomplete characterization of 3D differences and effects of mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) on the mandible compared to normal controls. METHODS: PRS infants who underwent MDO at 2 craniofacial referral centerals with pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were identified. A group of age-matched control patients with CTs were identified in the PACS database. Demographic and perioperative data were recorded. Mandibular lengths, angles, and volumes were measured. Morphologic and outcomes data were analyzed in a case-control comparison. RESULTS: Sixty-three CT scans were analyzed. Fifteen pre-op PRS patient and 15 control CTs were well matched in terms of age and sex. Mandibular volume (78%), ramus length (87%), and body length (95%) were all decreased in the PRS patients. Anterior symphyseal angle (84%) was significantly reduced in PRS patients while mandibular angle (102%) was maintained. Eighteen post-op PRS patient and 15 control CTs were well matched in terms of age and gender. Mandibular volumes (106%) were normalized following distraction with shorter mandibular rami (88%) and longer mandibular bodies (109%). Postoperatively, mandibular angle (100%) and anterior symphyseal angle (99%) were ultimately indistinguishable from controls. CONCLUSIONS: The mandible in PRS is dysmorphic compared to age-matched controls. Overall, they have a smaller volume, shorter ramus, and an obtuse symphyseal angle. MDO improves mandibular volume and normalizes the symphyseal angle, but results in a longer mandibular body and shorter mandibular ramus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.603

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Craniofacial SurgerySame topicCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207