Bibliographic record
Abstract
From the perspective of neoliberal globalization, the purpose of this essay is to explore and understand the social and educational phenomenon of student’s migration from India to Canada, such as; Neoliberal globalization and its impact on higher education; Student mobility from India to Canada on their decision to pursue for higher studies; Indian and Canadian policies on international education and students; Factors Facilitating the success of overseas studies and the experience at the University of Alberta; Global Citizenship existence on international student. It is an expression of historical way of South American colonial, post-colonial, neo-colonial ideologies that are existed with present form of globalized and neo liberal ideologies to share thoughts within people all over the world but these present of universal thought, expression was not easy going in the past. However, a complete descriptions of ideologies which is active in present world order through deafening socialist ideologies. I would like to pursue my PhD in International Development and the ideas of liberalism, neo liberalism, colonialism, neo colonialism, globalization, will help me to understand global development by those ideologies. However, it has critical reviews, controversial thoughts but it has positive sides as well and I always prefer on positivism of globalization and neo liberalism through which world can be turns into one world order economically, I am hopeful.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".