MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2760178432 · doi:10.1353/cat.2017.0131

Preaching and Inquisition in Renaissance Italy. Words on Trial by Giorgio Caravale

2017· article· en· W2760178432 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul F. Grendler

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œCatholic historical review · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeresyEucharistConfession (law)ProtestantismHistoryClassicsTheologyPoliticsCanon lawArtPhilosophyLiteratureLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Preaching and Inquisition in Renaissance Italy. Words on Trial by Giorgio Caravale Paul F. Grendler Preaching and Inquisition in Renaissance Italy. Words on Trial. By Giorgio Caravale. Translated by Frank Gordon. [Catholic Christendom, 1300-1700.] (Leiden: Brill. 2016. Pp. xii, 274. €125,00. ISBN 978-90-04-32545-6.) This is the story of Ippolito Chizzola of Brescia (early 1520s–1565). He became a Lateran Canon Regular at the age of twelve, then became a well-known preacher by his late twenties. But he preached heresy by means of carefully chosen words, hints, implications, and omissions. Summoned to Rome, he began to testify before the Congregation of the Holy Office in July 1549. Under questioning Chizzola equivocated on confession, the Eucharist, and other Catholic doctrines. On July 1, 1550, the Holy Office ordered him to make the abjuration of someone [End Page 584] under strong suspicion of heresy. It sentenced him to return to Venice to read the text of abjuration publicly, then to preach sermons admitting his guilt in the same churches in which he had preached heresy in early 1549. After that, he returned to Rome where he lived in a Lateran Canons Regular convent. Then in the early 1560s he became "a zealous Catholic controversalist," who wrote works answering and refuting one of the chief Italian Protestant exile polemicists, Pier Paolo Vergerio. Chizzola also became a Roman informer for Duke Cosimo I de' Medici of Florence, and Chizzola relayed news of papal diplomatic maneuvering and other political and religious matters. Chizzola also tried to influence popes and key cardinals, with little success. Then he suddenly died in 1565. It is an interesting story well told by Caravale. An appendix prints the Italian and Latin transcription of Chizzola's inquisition trial plus an English translation. The English edition surprisingly does not give the provenance of the trial document, a manuscript that Caravale found in the Biblioteca Queriniana in Brescia. The book was originally published in Italian in 2012; spot checking indicates that the translation is very accurate. However, one wishes that the translator had divided paragraphs as much as four pages long into multiple paragraphs. The Italian edition also included fifty-four letters by and to Chizzola; they are omitted here. While interesting, they are less important than the trial document. Caravale deserves full credit for always giving the original Italian in the notes for translations in the text and for quite thorough documentation. There are two historical slips. Girolamo Savonarola was not burnt at the stake (p. 2); he was hanged and his body burnt. And relying on an old secondary source, Caravale states that Pietro Pomponazzi taught Greek to Celso Martinengo, who influenced Chizzola and later fled to Protestant Europe, at Ferrara (p. 56). However, Pomponazzi (1462–1525) was not known as a Greek scholar; he taught natural philosophy at the University of Ferrara between 1509 and 1512, and Martinengo was not born until 1515. Overall this is a good book that tells an interesting story that advances our knowledge of the complex religious situation in the middle of the sixteenth century. Paul F. Grendler University of Toronto Emeritus Copyright © 2017 The Catholic University of America Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œCatholic historical reviewSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207