Effects of trait anxiety and exercise habits on psychological response to exercise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated the hypothesis that the effects of an acute bout of exercise on psychological response (PR), such as state anxiety and mood, may be influenced by individual levels of trait anxiety with exercise habits and anticipatory responses (AR) prior to the exercise. One hundred and two male and 48 female undergraduates in university athletic clubs were used as a sample of individuals with regular exercise habits, and 81 male and 55 female non-athletic students were used as a sample of individuals with non-exercise habits. The subjects completed the trait version of Spielberger's State-Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T) and the Activity Index as screening tests. From the high and low STAI-T students with exercise and non-exercise habits, 48 subjects were selected by gender for the experiment. All subjects completed the state version of the STAI (STAI-S) and the Profile of Mood States (POMS) as measures of AR prior to, and following a 12-min bicycle ergometer task with prior warm-up at a heart rate of 120 bpm. The results showed that the level of trait anxiety influenced the PR scores in the STAI-S and some subscales of the POMS, even after statistically controlling for their AR scores. The PR scores were affected by the AR scores of the STAI-S and depression of the POMS, while the AR scores had significantly closer relationships with the differences before and after the tests in the tension and fatigue subscales of the POMS than with the PR scores following exercise. These results suggest that PR following exercise depends on trait factors such as anxiety and exercise habit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".