Central line associated bloodstream infections in the NICU: Does vancomycin-intermediate heteroresistance of coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococcus</i> matter?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether the duration of bacteremia among patients in the NICU, as well as risk of thrombocytopenia, differed between those with a central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) due to a hetero-resistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus epidermidis (hVISE) and those whose CLABSI was due to vancomycin-susceptible S. epidermidis (VSSE). Methods: This retrospective cohort study covering the period from November 2009 through April 2014 examined records for 114 patients with coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) CLABSI from two tertiary-care NICUs in Québec. Results: Of 111 patients included in the final analysis, 98 had an hVISE infection. The median duration of bacteremia was 4 days (range 0–33 days) for patients with hVISE and 4 days (range 2–8 days) for patients without hVISE. The duration of bacteremia was not significantly different between those with and without hVISE infection (B=−0.56, 95% CI −2.76 to 1.65). Further, the risk of thrombocytopenia for patients with and without hVISE was not significantly different (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.076 to 2.72). Conclusions: hVISE was not shown to be associated with a longer duration of bacteremia or a greater risk of thrombocytopenia. This suggests that hVISE may not have a greater clinical impact than VSSE in infants with CLABSI. However, due to the small number of patients with VSSE in our cohort, firm conclusions cannot be drawn. Larger, multi-centre studies are needed to assess the true clinical relevance of vancomycin-intermediate hetero-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (hVICoNS) and before concluding on the need for hV identification in a clinical laboratory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".