Codigestion of high pressure thermal hydrolysis‐treated thickened waste activated sludge with primary sludge in two‐stage anaerobic digestion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pretreatment of thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) with high pressure thermal hydrolysis (HPTH) prior to co‐digestion with primary sludge (PS) in two‐stage anaerobic digestion was evaluated at two systems hydraulic residence times (HRTs). Pretreatment increased the soluble COD (SCOD) entering the acidogenic digester and at a 2 day HRT the increase in SCOD through the digester was also enhanced. With a 1 day HRT in the acidogenic digester the increment in SCOD concentrations was smaller in the pretreated reactor than in the control reactor suggesting there is a minimum residence time required to maintain hydrolysis of pretreated TWAS. At the 2 day HRT fermentation to volatile fatty acids (VFA) was similar in both reactors despite the considerably higher SCOD concentrations in the pretreated sludge. In contrast, at the 1 day HRT the pretreated digester VFA concentrations were 36% higher than that of the control digester. The control and pretreated methanogenic digesters operating at an HRT of 13 days had average total COD (TCOD) removal efficiencies of 45 and 52%, respectively which was consistent with an increase in methane yield from 0.19 L CH 4 /g COD for the control system to 0.23 L CH 4 /g COD for the pretreated system. With an HRT of 9 days, the corresponding TCOD removal efficiencies were reduced to 43% in and 48% respectively and the methane yields were 0.14 and 0.16 L CH 4 /g COD, respectively. COD removal to methane was found to be not significantly different between the control and pretreated systems at the reduced HRT. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 37: 425–433, 2018
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".