Upper Ordovician conodont biostratigraphy and revised lithostratigraphy and geological map, Akpatok Island, Ungava Bay, Nunavut
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stratigraphic units exposed on Akpatok Island, Ungava Bay, Nunavut, were previously recognized as Boas River and Akpatok formations; their biostratigraphic ages and correlations, in particular the stratigraphic position and age of the organic rich “Boas River” Formation, were largely based on limited data. New detailed field observations have recognized three stratigraphic units, namely the Amadjuak, Akpatok, and Foster Bay formations, in which extensive microfossil sampling recovered over 22 000 conodont elements from 66 productive samples from both outcrops and rubble at over 20 localities in four areas. Four Upper Ordovician conodont zones and one unzoned interval are established for the three redefined formations: Belodina confluens and Oulodus velicuspis Interval zones are confined to the exposed Amadjuak Formation and correlated to Edenian and Maysvillian; Amorphognathus ordovicicus – Plegagnathus dartoni Concurrent-range Zone occurs with the Akpatok Formation and correlated to lower Richmondian; Rhipidognathus symmetricus Taxon-range Zone is retained in the Foster Bay Formation and correlated to upper Richmondian; and an “Unzoned Interval” is defined between the last two zones in the lower Foster Bay Formation. The conodont Amorphognathus ordovicicus occurs in both Akpatok and lower Foster Bay formations, and it is also recovered from the bituminous, argillaceous limestone rubble, based on which the stratigraphic position of the previously named “Boas River” Formation is most likely positioned within the lower Foster Bay Formation. The biostratigraphy and lithostratigraphy are combined with geographic information systems (GIS) to establish the thicknesses of the three formations and revise the geologic map of the island.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".