MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2760828399 · doi:10.24870/cjb.2017-a35

Characterization of novel Phophatase from the genome of Genlisea aurea An in silico approach

2017· article· en· W2760828399 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sneha Ramrao Limbgaonkar, Biju V.C., Oommen V. Oommen, S. S. Vinod Chandra, Achuthsankar S. Nair, Baboo M. Nair

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Biotechnology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn silicoGenomeBiologyComputational biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Insectivorous plants use enzymes to digest their prey. These plants found in the tropical areas like forest of east India. Mostly insectivorous plants produce their own digestive enzymes to digest their captured insects and small animals diverge from protozoa to invertebrates. The plants need extreme sunlight and rainwater to sustain. These plants consume insects to suck the nutrients from the pray since the plant grows in nutrient less soil especially in nitrogen and potassium. The studies have shown the digestive enzyme from the plants has the proficiency to fight against the various diseases in human like Cancer, Diarrhea, Cholera, Hepatitis, Digestive process related diseases also the phytochemicals found in the insectivorous plants shows resistance against the various metabolic targets of numerous human diseases. Our study has collected 810 putative digestive enzymes with blast hit and domain search; we have characterized the full enzymes using partial sequence as a templet and predicted the function. The structure modelling has done for the phosphatase enzymes using I-Tesser server. Our future study includes in vitro identification of digestive enzymes in Genlisea aurea and its further application in degrading the waste materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BiotechnologySame topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207