The positioning of prosthetic Margo against gingival Margo, cause or not, of periodontitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The long, severe contour of prosthetic margo, remnants of cement used for adhesion, these are elements that affect the periodontal status of gingival margo, and then, the care of oral hygiene by the patient, affecting further aggravated gingival infection to fixed further in periodont.Methods: The experiment was conducted in 3 mice, to which were placed metal artificial crowns. It was controlled the effect of the mechanical action of prosthetic margo, established subgingival, agains the marginal gingival tissue.Results: The periodontal status was performed 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 1 month later, after placing the crows. After 2 months, was taken the samples of saliva for laboratory, to analyze the bacterial flora in the areas of the presence of gingival margo at the prosthetic crown.Conclusions: The presence of plaque that is not mechanically disconnected from gingival sulcus, influences the periodontal diseases that shows its characteristics, reflected significantly after 7 days, after 14 days, after 21 days. Signs of gingival inflammation are significant features of the evolution of related of periodontal illness, according to these dates already referred to us above.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".