MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2761152466 · doi:10.1093/pch/9.suppl_a.52a

108 Factors Associated with a History of Pregnancy among Adolescent Street Youth

2004· article· en· W2761152466 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nancy Haley, Eliane Roy, Pascale Leclerc, JF Boudreau, J.‐F. Boivin

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSocioeconomic statusPregnancyDemographyCohortProspective cohort studyFamily historyPediatricsPopulationInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To determine social and behavioural factors associated with a history of pregnancy among adolescent street youth. From January 1995 to September 2000, a prospective cohort study of street youth was carried out in Montreal; 1013 participants aged 14 to 25 were recruited. Female participants aged 14 to 19 years were selected and adolescent ever pregnant (AEP) were compared with adolescents never pregnant (ANP) using data from baseline questionnaires. Among the 1013 participants, 225 (22.2%) met the selection criteria and 94 of them (41.8%) had a history of pregnancy. AEP and ANP had similar demographic and socio-demographic characteristics: their mean age at entry was 17.8 years, 96.9% were Canadian born, 93.3% were French speaking, 58.6% were raised in families with comfortable socioeconomic status, and 54.2% were at least one year behind in school considering their age. However, AEP were more likely than ANP to have been kicked out of home (62.8% vs. 47.3%, p=0.022) and to have run away (78.7% vs. 64.9%, p=0.025). In addition, AEP had their first episode of homelessness at a younger mean age than ANP (13.9 years vs. 14.7 years, p=0.011). Both groups had problematic alcohol and drug use: 31.3% had a CAGE score >2 and 72.2% had a DAST score >6. Almost half (44.0%) had ever injected drugs and among these adolescent injectors, 45.1% had injected more than 100 times. AEP were almost one year younger at initiation into drug injection (15.2 years vs. 16.0 years, p=0.049) and more AEP had started injecting before 14 years of age (25.6% vs. 5.8%, p=0.007). Sexual abuse, either intra-familial or extra-familial, was highly prevalent among these adolescents, however, it was significantly more prevalent among AEP (71.3% vs. 56.5%, p=0.024) and they had had multiple abusers (71.6% vs. 50.0%, p=0.009). AEP were more likely to report intra-familial sexual abuse (39.4% vs. 24.4%, p=0.017) than ANP; as well abuse occurred at an earlier age for AEP than for ANP (mean age: 7.4 vs. 8.9 years, p=0.090) and was more severe: vaginal penetration (62.2% vs. 26.7%, p=0.004) and anal penetration (29.7% vs. 3.3%, p=0.005). Pregnancy is very common among adolescent street youth. Histories of early and severe intra familial sexual abuse and early injection drug use are strongly associated with a history of pregnancy among these adolescents. Interventions addressing these factors need to be considered when planning global health care and sexual health education for this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicHomelessness and Social Issues→French-language works237,207→