MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2761399362 · doi:10.33997/j.afs.2008.21.4.001

Susceptibility of Fingerlings of Indian Major Carps to Aphanomyces invadans

2008· article· en· W2761399362 on OpenAlexaff
Priyadarshini Pradhan, Chadag Vishnumurthy Mohan, K. M. Shankar, B. KUMAR

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Fisheries Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAquaculture disease management and microbiota
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyVeterinary medicineEpizooticFish <Actinopterygii>Aquatic animalParasitic diseaseFisheryZoologyDiseasePathologyVirologyMedicineOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epizootic ulcerative syndrome (EUS) is a serious disease of tropical fish. Although reported in over 100 species of fish, its impact on the widely cultured Indian major carps has not been properly assessed. Using artificial infection tests with Aphanomyces invadans, the etiological agent of EUS, the present investigation examined the disease susceptibility of fingerlings of Indian major carps. The disease susceptibility experiments indicated that there was 100% mortality in the case of all the three species of Indian major carps within an experimental period of 12 days. Histopathological examination of all the moribund fish indicated extensive myonecrosis in large areas of myotome and severe necrotic lesions in almost all internal organs due to the invasive spread of the hyphae. The massive internal necrotic pathology was reflected in the form of severe gross lesions and was always associated with mortalities. From the present study, it is confirmed that fingerlings of Indian major carps are highly susceptible to A. invadans infection. This is the first ever experimental infection studies with A. invadans in Indian major carps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Fisheries ScienceSame topicAquaculture disease management and microbiotaFrench-language works237,207