Structure-Based Design and Synthesis of New Estrane–Pyridine Derivatives as Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1B1 Inhibitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1B1 is a promising therapeutic strategy, as such an inhibitor could modulate the bioactivation of procarcinogens while reducing drug resistance. Based on docking studies, the synthesis of 12 estra-1,3,5(10)-triene derivatives containing a pyridin-3-/4-yl moiety at position C2, C3, or C4 was performed, and we measured their inhibitory activity on CYP1B1 using the ethoxyresorufin- O -deethylase (EROD) assay. The position of the nitrogen atom in the aromatic ring has little influence on their inhibition potency, but compounds with a pyridinyl at C2 of the steroid nucleus are more potent CYP1B1 inhibitors than those with a pyridinyl at C3 or C4. Estradiol derivatives (OH at C17β) are also 10-fold more potent inhibitors than estrone derivatives (carbonyl at C17). Thus, 2-(pyridin-3-yl)-estradiol ( 4a ) is the best CYP1B1 inhibitor (IC 50 = 0.011 μM) from this series of compounds, and the best steroid inhibitor reported until now. It is also 7.5-fold more potent than the well-known nonsteroidal CYP1B1 inhibitor α-naphthoflavone (IC 50 = 0.083 μM).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".