MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2761494154 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02681

A New Approach to Dynamic Vulcanization: Use of Functional Nitroxyls to Control Reaction Dynamics and Outcomes

2017· article· en· W2761494154 on OpenAlexaff
Michael W. Bodley, J. Scott Parent

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVulcanizationPolyolefinElastomerPolypropyleneMaterials sciencePeroxideMonomerPolymer chemistryRheometryPolymerPhase (matter)Polymer blendThermoplasticChemical engineeringPolymer scienceChemistryCopolymerComposite materialOrganic chemistryNatural rubber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method of exerting control over the dynamics and outcomes of radical-mediated polyolefin modifications is adapted for the dynamic vulcanization (DV) of polypropylene + poly(ethylene- co -octene) (PP+EOC) blends. Whereas the conventional peroxide-initiated DV of these blends produce extreme initial rates of EOC cross-linking and extensive PP matrix degradation, formulations containing nitroxyls that bear polymerizable functionality do not suffer from these limitations. Acryloyloxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine- N -oxyl (AOTEMPO), used alone or in combination with a triacrylate monomer, is used to delay the onset of polymer modification, raise the cross-link density of dispersed elastomer phase, and mitigate changes to the molecular weight of the thermoplastic matrix. Brief demonstrations of the influence of AOTEMPO on dicumyl peroxide (DCP) modifications of each blend component are followed by careful studies of PP+EOC dynamic vulcanization. Dispersed phase size distributions and melt-state oscillatory rheometry reveal the effect of AOTEMPO on DV product architecture and morphology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicPolymer Nanocomposites and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207