MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2761501629 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxx086.064

POST OPERATIVE NON-INVASIVE VENTILATION AND COMPLICATIONS IN OESOPHAGEAL ATRESIA-TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL FISTULA

2017· article· en· W2761501629 on OpenAlexaff
Amaryllis Ferrand, Somnath C. Roy, Ann Aspirot, Christophe Fauré

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal and GI Pathology
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTracheoesophageal fistulaMedicineAtresiaSurgeryFistulaGeneral surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Advancements in critical care have been instrumental in the observed improvement in survival and complication rates in Oesophageal atresia-Tracheo-Oesophageal Fistula (OA-TOF). Nearly all neonates with OA-TOF undergo assisted ventilation at some point in the course of their post operative care. Post operative assisted ventilation strategies are heterogenous from one center to another and to date limited data are available to guide current practices of assisted ventilation in cases of OA-TOF. OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to examine the impact of post operative assisted ventilation strategies on clinically relevant outcomes in a retrospective series of OA-TOF patients. DESIGN/METHODS: A single center retrospective chart review was conducted including all neonates born with OA-TOF 1986-2016 for whom complete ventilatory data were available. Exclusion criteria: death prior to surgical repair, presence of pulmonary disease, cardiac malformation resulting in severe pulmonary hypertension. Primary data points evaluated were: Post-operative ventilation strategy, Survival, Anastomotic Leakage, Stricture, Pneumothorax and Mediastinitis. Statistical significance was determined using Chi-square test for p less than 0.05. RESULTS: 70 patient charts were reviewed. Assisted ventilation was used in 69 infants.1 infant was extubated from the operating room. 3 (4.3%) infants required HFOV postoperatively, 69 (98.5%) infants required conventional ventilation postoperatively and 19 (27.1%) were bridged with postextubation non-invasive ventilation (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) or High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC)). Survival was 68 (97.1%), incidence of stricture was 25 (35.7%), anastomotic leak 14 (20%), pneumothorax 9 (12.9%) and mediastinitis 4 (5.7%). 11 (15%) infants were on CPAP post-operatively. CPAP was statistically associated to stricture and death. 2 (2.9%) infants were on NIPPV post-operatively. NIPPV statistically associated to death. 6 (8.5%) infants were on HFNC post-operatively. HFNC was statistically associated to anastomotic leak. 10 (14.3%) infants had long gap OA-TOF. Long gap was statistically associated to leak, stricture, mediatinitis, pneumothorax and pneumonia. 8 (11.4) infants were reintubated. Reintubation was statistically associated to pneumothorax, mediastinitis and death. CONCLUSION: The most important finding of the present study is that CPAP assisted ventilation is associated with a significantly higher rate of oesophageal stricture and HFNC assisted ventilation is associated with a significantly higher rate of anastomotic leakage following repair of OA-TOF. We hope to use these findings to develop guidelines for ventilation strategies in the care of babies born with OA-TOF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicEsophageal and GI PathologyFrench-language works237,207