MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2761541966 · doi:10.4000/palimpsestes.2180

Suggestive Sonorities: Representing and Translating Silence in Works by Québécois Poets Hector de Saint-Denys Garneau and Anne Hébert

2015· article· en· W2761541966 on OpenAlex
Agnès Whitfield

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePalimpsestes · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilencePoetrySAINTSound (geography)Representation (politics)ArtKey (lock)Mode (computer interface)LinguisticsLiteratureSociologyArt historyPhilosophyAestheticsAcousticsComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a mode of poetic communication, silence is a contradictory phenomenon—how can the lack of sound be “voiced”? Since silence in itself cannot be represented, other than by blank spaces, pauses, caesurae, or by the blank page, it must somehow be “suggested”. Drawing on notions from musicology and Sound Studies, this article explores issues in the textual representation of silence and its translation. The linguistic means by which two key Québécois poets, Hector de Saint-Denys Garneau and Anne Hébert, “translate” silence in their poems are identified, and the challenges these “effects of silence” pose for their Anglophone translators explored. In conclusion, the article sketches out areas of fruitful future collaboration between Sound Studies and Translation Studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it