MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2761674945 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggx439

Oceanic basement roughness alongside magma-poor rifted margins: insight into initial seafloor spreading

2017· article· en· W2761674945 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel Sauter, Julie Tugend, Morgane Gillard, M.F.R. Nirrengarten, Julia Autin, Giänreto Manatschal, Mathilde Cannat, Sylvie Leroy, Marc Schaming

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeafloor spreadingLithosphereMid-ocean ridgeOceanic crustRidgeBasementCrustMagmaPetrologySeismologyGeomorphologySubductionGeophysicsPaleontologyTectonicsVolcano

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The variation of oceanic basement roughness at mid-oceanic ridges is a complex trade-off between spreading rate that largely controls the thermal state of the lithosphere and its composition controlling the rheology and thus also the strength of the lithosphere. Here we estimate top basement roughness (i.e. the root-mean-square deviation of residual basement relief) over initial oceanic crust bordering the Iberia, Newfoundland, Bay of Biscay, Goban Spur, Flemish Cap, Australian and Antarctic rifted margins to provide new insights into the spreading processes at the nascent plate boundary. Although ultraslow seafloor spreading is suggested in those areas, the lack of undisputable oceanic magnetic anomalies prevents any well-constrained determination of the initial spreading rates. We compare these estimated roughness values with those determined over ultraslow-spreading crust formed at the Mid Atlantic Ridge, Southwest Indian Ridge, Arctic ridges, Mid-Cayman Spreading Center, Sheba ridge and South Pandora Ridge. The roughness values obtained at these ultraslow-spreading ridges range from 100 to >500 m and include 200–240 m roughness values which are typical of slow-spreading ridges. Roughness values larger than ∼300 m are characteristic of magma-poor sections of ultraslow-spreading ridges. The top basement roughness values determined within the inferred initial oceanic domain bordering the investigated magma-poor rifted margins are all higher than 200 m. Mean roughness values of the inferred initial oceanic domains alongside the conjugate Iberia and Newfoundland margins are greater than 300 m similarly to magma-poor sections of ultraslow-spreading ridges. The top basement in the initial oceanic crust alongside the conjugate Flemish Cap and Goban Spur margins shows roughness values and a tilted block morphology typical of slow-spreading ridges. We suggest that the roughness and the morphology of the top basement bordering the conjugate Australian and Antarctic margins indicate large tectonic extension and intermediate magma supply at either slow- or ultraslow-spreading rates. We show that estimating roughness values within transitional domains of magma-poor margins like exhumed mantle domains is less pertinent as polyphased tectonism and magmatism may have affected these domains leading to highly variable top basement roughness values that cannot be linked to a single process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207