MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2761781304 · doi:10.1186/s41181-017-0032-x

Improving the stability of 11C–labeled L-methionine with ascorbate

2017· article· en· W2761781304 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Woods, Leo Leung, Kari Frantzen, Jennifer G. Garrick, Zhengxing Zhang, Chengcheng Zhang, Wade English, Don Wilson, François Bénard, Kuo‐Shyan Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueEJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchLeading Edge Endowment Fund
KeywordsHigh-performance liquid chromatographyChemistryMethionineDegradation (telecommunications)ChromatographyMethionine sulfoxideElutionPositron emission tomographyBiochemistryNuclear medicineMedicineAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon-11 labeled L-methionine ( 11 C–MET) is a popular tracer used in the clinic for imaging brain tumors with positron emission tomography. However, the stability of 11 C–MET in its final formulation is not well documented in literature. Recently, we observed fast degradation of HPLC-purified 11 C–MET over time, and systematic investigation was conducted to identify the cause. In this study, we verified the degraded product as 11 C–labeled methionine sulfoxide ( 11 C–METSO). To minimize oxidation, ascorbate (100 ppm) was added to the HPLC eluant, and the resulting HPLC-purified 11 C–MET was stable in the final formulation solution without noticeable degradation for up to 1 h after the end of synthesis. Our data suggest that to minimize degradation, ascorbate can be added to the 11 C–MET formulation solution especially if it is not administered into patients soon after the end of synthesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEJNMMI Radiopharmacy and ChemistrySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207