INVESTIGACIÓN MUNDIAL SOBRE EL ORIGEN DEL HOMO SAPIENS. LA ENCABEZA LA UNIVERSIDAD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LA UNAM, MEDIANTE EL INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES ANTROPOLOGICAS (IIA), CONTINUA CON LA EJECUCION DEL PROYECTO INTERNACIONAL OCUPACION TEMPRANA DE HOMO SAPIENS EN LA PLUVISELVA TROPICAL DE GUINEA ECUATORIAL: RIFT DE UORO-RIO WELE, EL CUAL ES ENCABEZADO POR ALEJANDRO TERRAZAS MATA, DEL LABORATORIO DE PREHISTORIA Y EVOLUCION HUMANA. SE TRATA DEL PRIMER GRAN TRABAJO GLOBAL DEDICADO A ENTENDER COMO Y POR QUE SE GENERO EL HOMO SAPIENS , ASI COMO INDAGAR Y COMPRENDER COMO PARTICIPO UNA TERCERA PARTE DEL CONTINENTE AFRICANO, ES DECIR, SUS SELVAS TROPICALES, EN EL ORIGEN DE NUESTRA ESPECIE. “POR VEZ PRIMERA UN PROYECTO DE PALEOANTROPOLOGIA MEXICANO SE DESARROLLA EN EL CONTINENTE AFRICANO Y ES CIEN POR CIENTO COORDINADO DESDE NUESTRO PAIS, AUN CON COLABORADORES DEL AMBITO INTERNACIONAL”, DIJO TERRAZAS MATA, PREVIO A SU PARTIDA A AFRICA CENTRAL. INTERVIENEN TAMBIEN BOTANICOS Y ANTROPOLOGOS DE LA UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE GUINEA ECUATORIAL, ASI COMO DE LAS UNIVERSIDADES DE CALGARY, CANADA; BERKELEY, ESTADOS UNIDOS, E INSTITUCIONES DE EDUCACION SUPERIOR DE ESPANA. EN LA PARTE DE LA GENERACION Y PROCESO DEL CONOCIMIENTO EN LABORATORIOS EN MEXICO, PARTICIPAN 17 UNIVERSITARIOS INTEGRANTES DEL IIA, ASI COMO DE LOS INSTITUTOS DE FISICA, DE GEOFISICA Y DE GEOLOGIA DE LA UNAM. ADEMAS DE LA LABOR INTERINSTITUCIONAL CON ACADEMICOS DE LA ESCUELA NACIONAL DE ANTROPOLOGIA E HISTORIA. ALEJANDRO TERRAZAS NARRA EL ORIGEN Y DESARROLLO DE DICHO PROYECTO.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".