MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2761893355 · doi:10.1093/pch/20.5.e42b

26: A Clinical Decision Rule to Identify Skull Fracture Among Young Children with Isolated Head Trauma

2015· article· en· W2761893355 on OpenAlexaff
Jocelyn Gravel, Sarah Gouin, Dominic Chalut, Louis Crevier, JC Décarie, Nicolas Elazhary, Benoı̂t Mâsse

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiological weaponMedicineSkull fractureHead traumaSkullHead injuryPediatricsProspective cohort studySurgeryRadiologyPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is no clear consensus regarding the use of skull radiological evaluation for young children who sustained a head trauma without traumatic brain injury. The primary objective of this study was to derive and validate a clinical decision rule to identify skull fracture among children younger than two years of age with head trauma and no need for head tomography. This was a prospective cohort study performed in three tertiary care pediatric emergency departments. Participants were all children younger than 24 months of age who sustained a head trauma and for whom head tomography was not highly recommended according to the PECARN head CT scan rule. The primary outcome was the presence of a skull fracture according to radiological report. A-priori, 28 independent variables were identified through a literature review and experts consensus. All participants were initially evaluated by a physician using a standardized datasheet before radiological evaluation. Radiological evaluation was left to the treating physician discretion. A clinical decision rule was derived using recursive partitioning. It was estimated that a sample of 45 cases of fracture would be necessary to derive the rule. Then, a second sample including at least 40 patients with a skull fracture were prospectively recruited for the validation. A total of 811 patients were recruited during the derivation period. Among them, 49 had a skull fracture. Recursive partitioning was used to derive a simple clinical decision rule to identify skull fracture. Parietal or occipital swelling/hematoma and age younger than two months of age were the items of the rule. It showed a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI 83% to 99%) and specificity of 86% (95% CI 845 to 89%) in the derivation phase. Subsequently, 856 participants were recruited during the validation phase including 44 with a skull fracture. The clinical decision rule had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 76% to 95%) and a specificity of 87% (95% CI 84% to 89%). Using the rule would have decreased the number of radiological evaluation from 366 to 148. Four of the five missed fractures were in children younger than four months of age. This clinical decision rule identifies young children at higher risk of skull fractures following an acute head trauma with no definitive indication for head tomography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.072
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.072
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances→French-language works237,207→