A study of REOLYSIN in combination with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in patients (pts) with relapsed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (MAP).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e15753 Background: REOLYSIN is an immuno-oncology-reoviral agent that induces an inflamed tumor phenotype secondary to viral infection of cancer cells. In combination with chemotherapy, it achieves 1 & 2 year-survival rates of 46% & 24% in MAP pts, respectively. Tumor analysis from pts showed reovirus protein replication, T-cell infiltration and upregulation of PD-L1. Similarly, the combination of REOLYSIN with anti-PD-1 antibody documented survival benefit in a pre-clinical model. We hypothesized that REOLYSIN in combination with chemo and pembrolizumab in pts with MAP would be clinically efficacious. Methods: A phase 2 study (NCT02620423) enrolled MAP pts who progressed after first line treatment. Pts received REOLYSIN (4.5 x 10 10 TCID 50 IV, D1 & D2), plus pembrolizumab (2mg/kg IV, D8) plus either 1)5-FU (LV (200 mg/m 2 /5-FU 200 mg /m 2 IV bolus, 5-FU 1200mg/m 2 continuous IV infusion D1) or 2) gemcitabine (1000 mg/m 2 IV, D1), or 3) irinotecan (125 mg/m 2 IV, D1) q3w, until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary objectives included tumor response & evaluation for reovirus replication/immune analysis. We report results of safety cohort analysis. Results: 11 pts were enrolled with REOLYSIN, pembrolizumab and gem (n = 6), 5-FU (n = 3), or iri (n = 2). Grade 1 or 2 TEAEs occurred in all pts: fever (64%), headache (55%), chills (46%), fatigue (46%), dehydration (27%), and nausea (27%). In one pt (gem arm), transient Gr 2 increased transaminases was reported on two occasions. Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs occurred in 8 pts (73%): abdominal pain, anemia, arthralgias, biliary obstruction, chills, DVT, diarrhea, fever, hyperglycemia, leukopenia, myalgias, nausea, neutropenia, pulmonary emboli, vomiting. Of the 5 efficacy evaluable pts, one had PR (6 m duration) and 2 SD (lasting 126 and 221 days). Seven died secondary to PD. On-treatment biopsy show reovirus infection in cancer cells and immune infiltrates. Conclusions: The combination therapy showed manageable safety profiles and antitumor activity in previously treated MAP pts. Further evaluation of anti-tumor activity of REOLYSIN and anti-PD-1 antibody ± chemotherapy combos is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02620423.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".