MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762095266 · doi:10.18260/1-2--16648

Communications Instruction In First Year Engineering: The Glue

2020· article· en· W2762095266 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Lockwood, Daryl Caswell, Marjan Eggermont

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Education and Curriculum Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGLUEComputer scienceSoftware engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design and Communications One and ENGG 253: Design and Communications Two are the flagship courses for the Common Core year at The S___ School of Engineering, University of C___.Mandatory courses for all first year (~730) students, ENGG 251/253 are project-based courses on engineering design, taught by an interdisciplinary team drawn from all divisions of engineering, fine arts and communications.This paper serves to examine the role and work of the communications instructor within that interdisciplinary team, and to offer some insight into the ways that communications can be integrated into the engineering curriculum, as well as the benefits that communications brings to the instructor team.Because of the unique interdisciplinary structure of these courses, the communications instructor holds a tri-partite position as a solo instructor, a team instructor, and as the course technical writer.As a solo instructor, the communication instructor delivers 6-8 1-hour lectures per semester, on a combination of communication theory and practical writing and oral presentation material.As a team instructor, the communications instructor works to design, plan and implement at least one major project per academic year, and serves as a resource for other instructors.As well, the communications instructor is responsible for the creation of all assignment and project documents, as well as all grading/evaluation guides for the T.A.s Finally, the communications instructor acts as supervisor for the 4-6 communications T.A.s assigned to the course.As the course technical writer, the communications instructor produces all reports, manuals and documentation for the course.In addition, the communications instructor serves as co-marker on all assignment exemplars, to ensure that all T.A.s are marking to the same standard.This paper redefines the role of the communications instructor to capitalize on this many faceted skill set that, if properly integrated, can greatly enhance the quality, scope and relevance to the engineering educational coursework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0170.013
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEngineering Education and Curriculum DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207