MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2762387700 · doi:10.1093/pch/19.6.e35-79

81: Is Epidural Analgesia in Labor Associated with Respiratory Distress in Late Preterm Infants? – a Retrospective Cohort Study

2014· article· en· W2762387700 on OpenAlexaffabout
Manoj Kumar, Heather L. Rylance, Zainab Ijaz, A. Senthilselvan

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeonatal resuscitationRespiratory distressApgar scoreGestational ageObstetricsFentanylAnesthesiaResuscitationPregnancyOligohydramniosGestation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epidural analgesia is the commonest mode of providing analgesia during labor, with a combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl most often used in practice. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that opioids diffuse freely from the epidural space into maternal blood and across the placenta. To test whether late-preterm infants exposed to opioids from maternal epidural analgesia in labor are more likely to develop respiratory distress in the immediate neonatal period. Singleton babies of 33 to 36 weeks gestation, born between the dates of January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2011 at two hospital sites in Edmonton were eligible for recruitment. Subjects with major congenital malformations, culture proven sepsis, or birth by elective caesarean section without onset of labor were excluded. The outcomes of babies exposed to epidural analgesia (Exposed group) were compared with babies without epidural exposure (Unexposed group) adjusting for the following variables, ie, gestational age at birth, infant's sex, site of birth, antenatal steroids, maternal diabetes and hypertension, oligohydramnios, route of delivery and other modes of analgesia used in labor. The outcomes of interest were Apgar scores at 1 min and 5 min, need for resuscitation (defined as need for any one of the following in the delivery room – bag and mask ventilation, intubation, chest compression or resuscitation drugs) and development of respiratory distress within 24 h of birth. We recruited 1045 infants; 12.5% needed resuscitation in the delivery room and 15.6% developed respiratory distress following admission to the NICU. 58.6% subjects were exposed to epidural analgesia in labor. The exposure to epidural analgesia was associated with lower 1 min (P=0.009) and 5 min (P<0.001) Apgar scores but not with greater need for resuscitation (P=0.43) or the development of respiratory distress (OR 1.30 [95% CI 0.86 to 1.96]; P=0.220). In subgroup analysis, we noted a trend towards higher incidence of respiratory distress in infants at 33 to 34 weeks gestation (OR 1.45 [95% CI 0.91 to 2.30]; P=0.11) exposed to epidural analgesia. Exposure to maternal epidural analgesia was associated with lower Apgar scores in late preterm infants with a trend towards higher risk of development of respiratory distress in more immature infants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→