MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762461784 · doi:10.24870/cjb.2017-a22

sigFeature: an R-package for significant feature selection using SVM-RFE and t-statistic

2017· article· en· W2762461784 on OpenAlex
Pijush K. Das, Susanta Roychoudhury, Sucheta Tripathy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Biotechnology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatisticFeature selectionSupport vector machineSelection (genetic algorithm)Feature (linguistics)StatisticsComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceR packageMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depending on the sub-site of the primary tumour, up to thirty percent of the patients with clinical and radiological node negative HNSCC may have occult metastases. Therefore, currently, up to seventy percent patients with node negative neck disease receive unnecessary therapy to ensure a minority who are truly at risk [1]. The treatment of HNSCC involves surgery, radiotherapy or multimodality therapy like surgery together with adjuvant radiotherapy or chemo radiotherapy. HNSCC is typically considered as a homogeneous tumour group, i.e., histopathologically identical, but they are often genetically disparate and exhibit variable biological behaviour and response to treatment between and within anatomical sub-sites [2]. Currently, treatment decisions for patients with HNSCC are still based on clinical, radiological and pathologic parameters. No molecular markers are used for treatment decision, except in ongoing research protocols. To identify those patients who are truly at risk, a novel feature selection method has been introduced based on expressional genomic data in this study. In data mining, feature selection is an extremely dynamic field of research for classification in the field of machine learning technology. The aim of feature selection is to select a small subset of a feature from a larger pool, rendering not only a good performance of classification but also biologically meaningful insights. Filter methods e.g. the support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) is recognised as one of the most effective methods. The RFE-SVM algorithm is a greedy method that only hopes to find the best possible combination for classification without considering the differentially significant feature between the classes. To overcome this limitation of SVM-RFE, our proposed approach which is based on RFE-SVM and t-statistic is to find out differentially significant features along with the good performance of classification. The experimental results which we obtained after analysing six publicly available micro array datasets are very promising and show the contribution in feature selection in machine learning technology. The main conclusion is that the selected features are differentially significant between the classes and able to produce good classification accuracy which will help further downstream analysis for strengthening the biological aspect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it