25: Determinants of Oral Corticosteroid Responsiveness in Wheezing Asthmatic Youth (Doorway)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although oral corticosteroids (OCS) are the cornerstone of acute asthma management in the emergency department (ED), recent trials have questioned the efficacy of OCS in preschool-aged children presenting with viral-induced wheezing episodes. The aim of the study was to determine the magnitude, and potential determinants, of OCS responsiveness in children presenting to the ED with moderate or severe asthma. We conducted a prospective multicentre cohort study of children aged 1–17 years presenting to the ED with an acute moderate or severe asthma exacerbation, defined as a Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score of 4–7 or 8–12, respectively. All children received standardized treatment with prednisone or equivalent (2 mg/kg in four sites and 1 mg/kg in one site, maximum: 50 mg) and severity-specific co-interventions (salbutamol with/without ipratropium bromide) as per national guidelines. Key determinants included age, sex, baseline PRAM, site, viral aetiology (polymerase chain reaction [PCR] on nasopharyngeal swabs), tobacco exposure (salivary cotinine) and OCS dose. The primary efficacy endpoint was ED management failure (i.e., hospital admission, prolonged (≥8 hours) ED stay, or a return visit within 72 hours with an admission or prolonged stay). Of the 973 participants, most were preschoolers (75.1%), males (66.3%) and presented with a moderate (72.5%) exacerbation. Children received 2 mg/kg (82.2%) or 1 (17.8%) mg/kg of prednisone or equivalent: 165 (17.1%) experienced ED management failure; 579 (62.1%) had a PCR-confirmed viral infection (45% rhinoviruses; 17.3% respiratory syncythial virus; 9.7% metapneumovirus); 53 (5.3%) had elevated salivary cotinine (≥4 ng/mL); and 260 (26.8%) had suspected (1≤ cotinine <4 ng/mL) or reported environmental tobacco smoke exposure. After adjusting for co-variables, ED management failure was significantly associated with baseline PRAM (OR 1.49 [95% CI 1.34 to1.65], for each additional PRAM point), concurrent pneumonia (OR 4.56 [2.73 to 7.61]) and sites. The two sites with protocolized asthma management initiated by nurses were associated with 50% lower admission rates. Of note, age, sex, PCR-confirmed viral infection, saliva cotinine, and dose/kg of OCS were not significantly associated with the magnitude of response. Preschool age and viral triggers do not increase the risk of ED management failure or poor response to OCS in children. However, increasing severity of the exacerbation, concurrent pneumonia, and sites were significantly associated with ED management failure. In sites with protocolized asthma management, rapid administration of OCS (irrespective of dose) decreased by half the risk of ED treatment failures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".