MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2762523537 · doi:10.1093/pch/9.suppl_a.44a

81 Evaluation of the Impact of the S.T.A.B.L.E. Program on the Pre-Transport Care of the Neonate in Nova Scotia

2004· article· en· W2762523537 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nancy O’Neill, Alexandra Howlett

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaPsychological interventionLikert scaleMedicineHealth careFamily medicinePediatricsNursingPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The S.T.A.B.L.E. Program is a standardized educational program focusing on the stabilization of the critically ill neonate prior to transport. The S.T.A.B.L.E. Program was implemented over 13 months in all referring centers (12) providing obstetrical services in Nova Scotia in 1999. The program has been widely implemented in the United States but has not been previously evaluated. To assess if the S.T.A.B.L.E. Program increases regional healthcare provider perceived confidence in pre-transport stabilization; to determine if the S.T.A.B.L.E. Program guidelines are incorporated into healthcare provider clinical practice; and to assess if the pre-transport management of neonates has improved. A retrospective chart review of all Nova Scotia neonates transported to the NICU at the IWK Health Centre in two time periods (pre- and post-S.T.A.B.L.E. implementation). Information obtained included birthweight, gestation and time spent at the referring center by the Neonatal Transport Team. An analysis of interventions based on S.T.A.B.L.E. guidelines begun by the referring Centre in the two time periods was performed. A questionnaire utilizing a Likert scale was sent to all healthcare providers in Nova Scotia who had participated in the S.T.A.B.L.E. Program during the initial 13 months, to evaluate participant satisfaction, self-perceived confidence and change in practice. 64/124 (52%) questionnaires were completed. Nearly all participants (96%) indicated the course was relevant and useful. 90% indicated that they felt more confident in neonatal pre-transport stabilization, and 86.5% indicated that they had adopted principles of the S.T.A.B.L.E. Program into their practice. 127 charts of infants transported to the NICU were reviewed: 80 pre-S.T.A.B.L.E., 47 post-S.T.A.B.L.E. There were no differences in birth-weight or gestation between the two groups. There were no differences found between the two groups for: improved glucose, thermoregulation, BP stability, increased intubation if needed or for stabilization time required on arrival of the Neonatal Transport Team. Although this study did not find an improvement in clinical outcome, it highlights the increase in provider confidence since the S.T.A.B.L.E. Program was implemented. As this study was carried out in a region with a well established regionalized healthcare system with strong prenatal referral patterns for premature infants, further evaluation of the S.T.A.B.L.E. Program in regions with higher rates of outborn deliveries is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies→French-language works237,207→