MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762566518 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2017-0070

Approximate analytical solutions to nonlinear peristaltic flow with temperature-dependent viscosity parameters: Application of multi-step differential transform method (MsDTM)

2017· article· en· W2762566518 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M.A. Elogail, A. A. ElShekhipy

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsPhysicsReynolds numberViscosityPressure gradientNonlinear systemFlow (mathematics)Newtonian fluidOrdinary differential equationWavelengthBoundary value problemConstant (computer programming)ThermodynamicsPartial differential equationDifferential equationMathematical analysisMathematicsOpticsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the influence of temperature-dependent viscosity on peristaltic flow of a Newtonian fluid past a vertical asymmetric channel through a porous medium in the presence of heat and mass transfer. A mathematical model is analyzed under assumptions of long wavelength and small Reynolds number. The resulting system of coupled nonlinear differential equations with corresponding boundary conditions is computed in two different cases. In the first case (labeled as system I), all non-dimensional parameters, which are functions of viscosity, have been considered as constants within the flow (as treated in previous peristaltic flow problems). In the second case (labeled as system II), these mentioned parameters are then assumed to vary with temperature. Solutions in each case have been obtained using an easy and highly accurate series-based method called the multi-step differential transform method (MsDTM). The effects of the pertinent physical parameters on the longitudinal velocity, temperature, concentration, longitudinal pressure gradient, and pressure rise per wavelength are analyzed graphically and through tables for both systems I and II. The results reveal that the longitudinal pressure gradient and the pressure rise per wavelength in the case of system II are of lower magnitude than the equivalent values of system I. Another interesting observation is that the temperature field in the case of system II, increases with a decrease in the fluid viscosity, which is in accordance with physical observations, whereas the opposite behavior appears in the case of system I. A detailed comparison between system I and system II demonstrates that in modelling fluid problems with variable viscosity, treating the viscosity-dependent parameters as constants leads to unrealistic results. Such a model is applicable for the transportation of physiological flows (blood flow models) in the arteries with heat and mass transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207