MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762657532 · doi:10.1093/pch/20.5.e82

132: Pediatric Intravenous Line Longevity

2015· article· en· W2762657532 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Thorpe, Juliet Soper, Jane DeGroot

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinopathy of Prematurity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterquartile rangeMedicineCatheterRetrospective cohort studyPediatricsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peripheral Intravenous (IV) insertion in children is a traumatic procedure. Minimizing the number of IV lines a child needs throughout an admission improves the child's care experience. To identify modifiable factors affecting longevity of peripheral IV lines in children. A retrospective chart review of IV lines on the pediatric ward in a small urban center (approximately 1700 admissions per year) was conducted between December 1st, 2013 and February 28th, 2014. IV lines which were removed because they were no longer required within 48 hours of insertion were excluded. The length of time an IV line spent in situ, its uses, location, and catheter size, and the reason for removal were recorded. Time spent saline locked or running at a rate of up to 10 mL/hour ‘to keep vein open’ (TKVO) was also recorded for each line. χ2, Fisher Exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to identify factors associated with IV line longevity. The primary outcome in this analysis was survival of IV line at 48 hours after insertion, as this is a common duration of antibiotics for children awaiting negative culture results. This study received local ethics board approval. A total of 284 IV lines were reviewed; 139 IV lines met the inclusion criteria. Lines remained in situ for a median of 62.3 hours (range 0.3–368.5, interquartile range 36.0, 77.0). 59% (n=55) of lines which lasted more than 48 hours spent greater than 20% of the IV duration TKVO compared to 28% (n=13) of lines which failed prior to 48 hours (P=0.001). Catheter size (P=1.0), insertion site (P=0.23), spending greater than 20% of line duration saline locked (P=0.67), and running fluids and/or medications at a rate above 10 mL/hour for greater than 20% of line duration (P=0.81) were not associated with IV line longevity. In this retrospective analysis, the majority of IV lines which spent greater than 20% of their duration running fluids at TKVO rates remained in situ for at least 48 hours, whereas lines which spent greater than 20% of their duration saline locked were no more likely to survive than to fail at 48 hours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicRetinopathy of Prematurity StudiesFrench-language works237,207